WalkingPad C2 vs P1

Written by Jamie Miller, Founder & EditorLast checked 18 September 2026

Same footprint, same top speed, different fold and a motor figure that means less than it looks. The C2 folds flat in half; the P1 folds in half along its length instead — different fold axis, which changes the shape of the folded unit more than the size.

WalkingPad C2 versus P1 specifications
	C2	P1
Deck	120 × 40 cm	120 × 41.5 cm
Unit weight	25 kg	28 kg
Max user weight	100 kg	100 kg
Top speed	6 km/h	6 km/h
Folds	Folds flat in half	Folds in half along its length
Motor	1 HP (type unstated)	not established — source gives 746W input, no HP figure; not converted, see below

Manufacturer stated, checked 18 Sept 2026 Both manufacturer-sourced, not verified by us.

The motor figure that needs unpicking

The C2's page states "1HP Brushless motor" with no indication of peak or continuous rating. The P1's page states no horsepower figure at all — only "746 W" power input. 746 watts happens to equal exactly one mechanical horsepower, which makes it tempting to write "1 HP" for the P1 too. We have not done that: input watts and output horsepower are not the same measurement, and the source gives neither a horsepower figure nor a stated conversion. Writing one would be inventing a number the source does not support.Manufacturer stated, Manufacturer spec, checked 18 Sept 2026

Which fold suits you

Folding flat in half (C2) generally gives a slimmer profile for sliding under low furniture. Folding along its length (P1) changes the footprint shape rather than just its thickness. Which is more convenient depends on where you intend to store it — check the folded dimensions against your specific space rather than assuming either is universally more compact.

What we have not established

Noise level, real-world durability, and how either performs on an actual work call — none of these are published by either manufacturer to a standard we would trust, and we have not tested either machine ourselves. How we review.